BeeTheory · Foundations · Technical Note XVIII

Five Simplified Cases:
One Component at a Time

Before combining the five baryonic components into full-galaxy predictions, this note evaluates each component in isolation. A reference galaxy with $R_d = 2$ kpc carries, in turn, only a bulge, only a thin disk, only a thick disk, only a gas ring, or only a spiral arm excess — each holding the full reference mass. The result for each isolated case shows the characteristic signature of that geometry: how it rises, where it peaks, and how it declines under the BeeTheory Yukawa kernel.

1. The result first

Five geometries, five distinctive rotation signatures

For the same total mass ($10^{10}\,M_\odot$ for stellar components, $1.33 \times 10^{9}\,M_\odot$ for the gas case) and the same reference disk size $R_d = 2$ kpc:

Bulge alone peaks at $V \approx 127$ km/s near $R = 1$ kpc and declines steeply — the most centrally concentrated signature.

Thin disk alone reaches $V \approx 212$ km/s at $R = 8$–$10$ kpc and stays roughly flat afterwards.

Thick disk alone reaches similar $V \approx 208$ km/s but more slowly, with the maximum displaced to larger radii.

Gas ring alone, carrying only $\sim 13\%$ of the stellar mass scale, peaks at $V \approx 60$ km/s — modest but extended.

Spiral arms alone (10% mass excess with a narrower kernel) produce a curve very similar to the thin disk but slightly steeper at intermediate $R$ and declining faster at large $R$.

2. Reference galaxy and isolated-component setup

The reference galaxy is a generic SPARC-type disk: $R_d = 2$ kpc, total stellar mass $10^{10}\,M_\odot$, HI mass $10^9\,M_\odot$ (gas mass $1.33 \times 10^9$ with helium correction). In each of the five cases, only one component is activated, carrying the full mass appropriate for its nature (stellar for cases 1, 2, 3, 5; gas for case 4). All other components are set to zero. The same global wave-field coupling $\lambda = 0.496$ is used throughout, with $K_0 = 0.3759$, $c_\text{disk} = 3.17$, $c_\text{sph} = 0.41$, $c_\text{arm} = 2.0$.

CaseComponentGeometryMassScaleCoherence length $\ell$
Case 1Bulge3D Hernquist sphere1.0×10¹⁰ $M_\odot$$r_b = 1.0$ kpc$\ell = 0.41$ kpc
Case 2Thin disk2D exponential1.0×10¹⁰ $M_\odot$$R_d = 2.0$ kpc$\ell = 6.34$ kpc
Case 3Thick disk2D exponential1.0×10¹⁰ $M_\odot$$R = 3.0$ kpc$\ell = 9.51$ kpc
Case 4Gas ring2D exp. with hole1.33×10⁹ $M_\odot$$R_g = 3.4$ kpc, $R_\text{hole} = 1.7$ kpc$\ell = 10.78$ kpc
Case 5Spiral arms2D modulation1.0×10¹⁰ $M_\odot$$R_d = 2.0$ kpc$\ell = 4.0$ kpc (narrower)
All cases use $\lambda = 0.496$, $K_0 = 0.3759$. The coherence length $ell$ is the only parameter that varies between cases sharing the same 2D ring geometry (cases 2, 3, 4, 5).

3. The five rotation curves on a single plot

Five isolated components — rotation curve of each alone 0.51235815 050100150200 Galactocentric radius R (kpc) — log scale Circular velocity V (km/s) Bulge (3D)Thin diskThick diskGas ringSpiral armsV_total (BeeTheory)V_baryonic (Newton)
Solid lines: full BeeTheory prediction $V_\text{tot}$. Dashed lines: baryonic Newtonian contribution alone, $V_\text{bar}$. The difference $V_\text{tot} – V_\text{bar}$ is the wave-field contribution generated by the visible matter of that component alone.

4. Numerical results at four key radii

For each component, the table reports the three velocity components — Newtonian baryonic / BeeTheory wave / total — at four reference radii. The format of each cell is $V_\text{bar}$ / $V_\text{wave}$ / $V_\text{tot}$ (km/s).

Component$R = 1$ kpc$R = 2$ kpc$R = 5$ kpc$R = 10$ kpc
Bulge104 / 73 / 12798 / 64 / 11777 / 42 / 8860 / 30 / 67
Thin disk54 / 85 / 10177 / 125 / 14791 / 179 / 20172 / 200 / 212
Thick disk34 / 65 / 7352 / 101 / 11373 / 157 / 17370 / 192 / 204
Gas ring6 / 12 / 1314 / 21 / 2524 / 39 / 4625 / 51 / 57
Spiral arms54 / 83 / 9977 / 121 / 14391 / 164 / 18872 / 168 / 183
Format: $V_\text{bar}$ / $V_\text{wave}$ / $V_\text{tot}$ in km/s. The total is the quadratic sum $\sqrt{V_\text{bar}^2 + V_\text{wave}^2}$.

5. Reading each case

Case 1 — Bulge alone

The bulge produces a sharp velocity rise: from $V_\text{tot} \approx 117$ km/s at $R = 0.5$ kpc to its maximum $V \approx 127$ km/s at $R = 1$ kpc, then declines steadily. The wave-field saturates by $R \approx 5$ kpc — beyond that, $M_\text{wave}$ stops growing. This is the signature of a 3D distribution with a very short coherence length ($ell_b = 0.41$ kpc): the field is intense at short distance and exponentially suppressed beyond. Pure bulges cannot maintain flat rotation curves; they need disk-scale companions.

Case 2 — Thin disk alone

The thin disk produces the most extended rotation curve: rising smoothly from $V \approx 100$ km/s at $R = 1$ kpc to $\sim 212$ km/s at $R = 8$ kpc, then staying flat to $R = 15$ kpc. The wave-field mass continues to grow steadily because $\ell_\text{thin} = 6.34$ kpc allows coherence over the full disk. This is the dominant component for most disk galaxies, producing the characteristic flat-rotation curve signature.

Case 3 — Thick disk alone

With the same total mass distributed over a $50\%$ larger scale, the thick disk produces a slower-rising curve that reaches a slightly lower peak ($V \approx 208$ km/s at $R = 10$ kpc). The longer coherence length $ell_text{thick} = 9.51$ kpc keeps the wave field active out to larger radii — the curve declines almost imperceptibly between $R = 10$ and $R = 15$ kpc. In a real galaxy, the thick disk carries only $\sim 25\%$ of the stellar mass, so its contribution is correspondingly modulated.

Case 4 — Gas ring alone

Despite carrying only $\sim 13\%$ of the stellar mass scale of cases 1–3, the gas ring produces a measurable rotation contribution: $V \approx 60$ km/s at large $R$. The curve rises gently (no central peak — the central hole suppresses the inner contribution) and continues to climb to the largest radii because of the long coherence $\ell_\text{gas} = 10.78$ kpc. The gas component is critical for shaping the outer rotation curve, particularly in gas-rich galaxies where it can account for a substantial fraction of the total wave field.

Case 5 — Spiral arms alone

The spiral arm component shares the thin-disk geometry but with the narrower kernel $\ell_\text{arm} = 4.0$ kpc. The result is a rotation curve very similar to the thin disk at $R \lesssim 6$ kpc — slightly less efficient at low $R$, equally efficient at intermediate $R$ — but declining noticeably faster at $R > 10$ kpc. The shorter coherence length reflects the azimuthal concentration of the arms: they generate strong local wave fields but cannot maintain coherence over the full extent of the disk. In a real galaxy, the arms carry only $10\%$ of the thin-disk mass, so their contribution is small but distinctive.

6. Cross-component comparison

Holding the total mass constant at $10^{10}\,M_\odot$ (stellar) lets us isolate the effect of geometry:

GeometryWhere does $V_\text{tot}$ peak?Maximum $V_\text{tot}$Behaviour at large $R$
3D Hernquist (bulge)$R \approx 1$ kpc (very central)$\approx 127$ km/sSteady decline (Keplerian)
2D thin disk ($\ell = 6.3$ kpc)$R \approx 8$–$10$ kpc$\approx 212$ km/sFlat up to $15$ kpc
2D thick disk ($\ell = 9.5$ kpc)$R \approx 10$ kpc$\approx 208$ km/sVery slowly declining
2D gas ring ($\ell = 10.8$ kpc, hole)$R \approx 12$–$15$ kpc$\approx 60$ km/s (smaller mass)Still rising at $15$ kpc
2D narrow kernel ($\ell = 4.0$ kpc)$R \approx 6$ kpc$\approx 190$ km/sDeclines from $R = 8$ kpc

The coherence length controls the extent of the wave field

Comparing the four 2D cases (which differ only by their value of $\ell$ and by the gas mass) shows clearly that the coherence length sets the radial extent of the BeeTheory wave field. Short $\ell$ (spiral arms, $\ell = 4$) produces a localised, fast-declining contribution. Long $\ell$ (gas ring, $\ell \approx 11$) produces a slowly-rising, extended contribution. This is the structural mechanism by which the BeeTheory model generates flat rotation curves: the disk-scale coherence keeps adding wave-field mass out to several disk scale lengths.

7. Summary

1. Each of the five BeeTheory components has been computed in isolation on a reference galaxy ($R_d = 2$ kpc, $M = 10^{10},M_odot$ for stellar components, $M = 1.33 times 10^9$ for gas).

2. The bulge alone produces a centrally peaked curve ($V \approx 127$ km/s at $R = 1$ kpc) that declines beyond — incapable of producing flat rotation on its own.

3. The thin and thick stellar disks produce flat or nearly-flat curves at $V \approx 200$ km/s out to large radii, with the thick disk’s peak displaced outward.

4. The gas ring, despite carrying $\sim 13\%$ of the stellar mass scale, contributes meaningfully at $V \approx 60$ km/s and dominates the extended outer regions in gas-rich galaxies.

5. The spiral-arm component, with its narrower kernel ($\ell = 4$ kpc), produces a thin-disk-like signature that declines faster at large radii — capturing the limited angular coherence of real spiral structure.

6. The coherence length $ell$ emerges as the single most important geometric parameter for the shape of each component’s contribution: short $ell$ gives localised peaks, long $ell$ gives extended flat curves.

7. These five isolated signatures will combine, weighted by their respective masses, when a full multi-component galaxy is computed — that is the subject of the subsequent notes.


References. Hernquist, L. — An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges, ApJ 356, 359 (1990). · Freeman, K. C. — On the disks of spiral and S0 galaxies, ApJ 160, 811 (1970). · Broeils, A. H., Rhee, M.-H. — Short 21-cm WSRT observations of spiral and irregular galaxies, A&A 324, 877 (1997). · Dutertre, X. — Bee Theory™: Wave-Based Modeling of Gravity, v2, BeeTheory.com (2023).

BeeTheory.com — Wave-based quantum gravity · Component validation · © Technoplane S.A.S. 2026